Linking wine sensory properties with harvest date (part 1)


Knowing when to harvest is a key step in the making of a good wine. Why is the timing of harvest so critical? How can harvest date affect the sensory perception of astringency in the final wine?

In a previous blog post, we described three components of fruit maturity: technological, phenolic and aromatic. Picking the optimal harvest window is challenging because of the complex response of these components to climate and vineyard practices. This post outlines common methods used by vineyards to determine harvest dates.

Many winemakers will claim that the most reliable tool they have to decide when to harvest is their palate. Winemakers taste the fruit on the vine to anticipate sensory perception in the final wine. While successful, this method is not practical or always reliable since each individual palate can produce different results.

On top of that, what the mouth tastes may not always reflect what will be extracted into the wine. To support such decisions, more winemakers are now backing up pre-harvest berry-tasting comments with fruit analysis.

Historically, analysis of sugars and acids found in the pulp have been the main chemical indices to track fruit ripeness. However, as aridity and heat wave frequency increase, fruit-sugar accumulation and acid degradation happen earlier because the pulp is essentially made of water.

Consequently the levels of sugar or acid concentrations are often disconnected from compositional changes observed in seeds and skin compartments, where flavanols responsible for bitterness/astringency are found. This phenomenon, referred to as an ‘asynchrony’ in ripening, has been reported widely by teams of researchers – for instance, in France by Garcia de Cortazar and in Australia by Sadras.

It is speculated that warmer temperatures during the growing season cause such asynchrony. To understand the extent of asynchrony, winemakers increasingly rely on analysis of flavonoids (particularly flavanols and anthocyanidins) regardless of pulp composition. A number of tools are available to help vineyards to gauge fruit composition and coloration pre-harvest such as Bacchimeter Signature.

These new insights offer a great opportunity to strengthen the bridge between viticulturists and winemakers. They require an understanding of fruit skin and seeds flavanols’ response to seasonal variations such as light exposure, drought or higher temperatures.

The original version of this post was published here.

Fruition Sciences offers a full suite of products addressing a variety of vineyard monitoring needs to enhance fruit and wine quality. Bacchimeter Signature, one of our latest offerings, helps vineyards optimize harvesting decisions based on fruit color areas and anthocyanin accumulation.

Posted by Vintage Report

The Vintage Report is a unique forum that aims to gather the industry’s most prominent vintners and scientists to discuss the previous vintage, present the latest innovative research and share technical advances in viticulture and enology.

The Vintage Report fosters <strong>innovation for sustainable advancements</strong> in winemaking through scientific presentations and lectures from the industry’s leading minds.

<strong>Check out for Vintage reports in your area <a href="">here </a></strong>

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.